Greatest Hits
- (L)Earning What I'm Worth
- The Save-to-Spend Budget
- Money Types: Carrie, Samantha, Miranda or Charlotte?
- Salary Negotiation Post - Retraction
- How Jenny Earned $15,000 on eBay
- Personal Account: Danielli, Part I
- The Fashionomics of Retail Begging
- 6 Steps to Better Pay
- Cheap, Quick Meals
- End the Superwoman Syndrome
- Rx for a Bloated Budget
- Create Other Income Streams
- Stop Wasting Time on Things That Will Never Make You Money
- The High Cost of Part-Time Work (+ working mom poll)
- Your (New & Improved?) Credit Card
- Prep for More Pay
- On Becoming a Financial Grown-up
- Challenge: Wear Just Six Things
- Personal Account: Gabrielle's Reflection on Worth
- Smash Student Loan Debt
The (Female) Cost of Living
By MP Dunleavey Wednesday December 16, 2009
It sounds almost silly: A survey of drug store goods, in the January issue of Consumer Reports, found that items aimed at women tend to cost more—sometimes 50% or 60% more.
What's disturbing is how pervasive and financially poisonous the so-called gender price bias is—especially when you consider that, on average, women earn about 23% less than men with comparable credentials.
Some other examples:
It almost sounds like a conspiracy. Women are generally paid less, yet from moisturizer to mortgages, our cost of living is significantly higher.
Why? Because we can't add? Because corporate America knows that women can be financially manipulated more easily than men?
You Tell Us: What are ways that you're being overcharged, why do you think women pay a premium for basics, how can we take back our money and use it to enrich our lives and our futures? Leave a comment below.
With thanks to Consumer Reports.
Get more details in MP Dunleavey's MSN Money column today on the same topic.
If you don't have a man to drag along with you for mechanical work on your car or replacement tires etc. take your brother, father, uncle or male friend, I guarantee you'll get a better deal.
Which also bring to mind the price difference between buying a Wedding dress vs. tuxedo rental- GAG!
I have noticed though that there is a trend that "metrosex male" products (fancier facewash, hair products, etc.) that have recently starting showing up more and more for men are on the same price scale as comparable women's products. I don't know if that's a step forward or a step back!
For beauty products, grocery store products, and more it makes sense, from a marketing/pricing strategy, to charge more for those products they know we will pay more for. After all, they're "luxury products" and not necessities that we "choose" to purchase.
In regards to mortgages and other financial services women are not as "dependable" as men. The fact that any day we can get pregnant is a threat to financial institutions, since our jobs could be threated by it.
Again, I don't agree but I understand.
As long as I pay the price and keep mum about the difference I will continue to be charged more. Finding the inequity and say no to it when I can is what I plan to do. When I can't effect a change, I'll take my hard-earned dollars elsewhere and publicize the businesses I do use.
Thanks for keeping the debate going here at Daily Worth. I look forward to future postings on this subject.
@Jasmine, I agree--we are willing to pay more (I confess having done so in my MSN Money column today). But maybe we shouldn't be! I have a friend with a fancy job and a mansion--and she buys ONLY the most basic products. kinda love that.
@Fernanda, I know where you got the idea that we are less dependable because we might get pregnant? That thinking governed the world back in the 1960s, when women routinely quit their jobs (as my mom did) when they were expecting. If you have data that I've misse, please send it to me: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it We have to cover all angles.
As for loans, mortgages and cars, these seem to be areas of discrimination that are taking a long time to evolve.
As far as haircuts, cosmetics, and clothes, I think the stereotype is that women are more concerned about their appearance, so they are willing to pay more to maintain it.
The question is, even if we can't change those stereotypes, how do we challenge the pricing discrepancy? How do we let Schick know that we're not shelling out for their pink razors?
I've been noticeably overcharged & even treated differently when my husband is & isn't around. The most notable difference in cost is our insurance. My husband's monthly cost is roughly $50 for medical, dental, and vision; mine is over $150.
When it comes to insurance, I've read that women tend to be more proactive about visiting doctors on a regular basis to stay healthy, which in turn costs the insurance company more, so they charge more for womens' coverage. Nice excuse, but still twisted.
I avoid being overcharged for cosmetics by NOT WEARING ANY. Have pride in your natural beauty and show yourself for who you really are, while simultaneously telling the cosmetics industry to stick it. They're a bunch of money-grubbing leaches preying on our self-esteem.
For hair, when it's trimmed (which is pretty rare) my daughter does it for me, or a hair dresser friend who charges me a minimal fee. I don't use hairspray or other "product" besides shampoo and conditioner.
Clothing is the biggest noticeable problem for me. I could buy my girl children the same clothes for less in the boys' sections of department stores.
It's an awesome community. Learn thrift and self reliance! My user name is Retro_Rose if you have any Q's for where to start. :o)
It is nice to think that we could all do away with all the things we are taught we need. But I see it going in the other direction much more and see men being socialized to want/need more stuff- face wash, fancy cologne, designer clothes, etc.
The dry cleaning is ridiculous (as are many other pricing disparities) but healthcare and mortgages make sense. For one thing these companies have literally terabytes worth of data on how much individuals (men and women) cost. It relates to age, race, location, employment, education, you name it and it is factored into determining the cost or insuring a person or loaning them money. The fact is that women of child bearing age will cost more to insure (health) regardless of whether they want children of not. Perhaps the cost would go down if the woman chose to have her tubes tied or another form of permanent birth control. But if there's a chance she can get pregnant then thats a risk that the insurance co has to assume and therefor calculate into their cost analysis. As for mortgages, the amounts of data are the same, and the calculation is similar risks vs. payoff. Simply, if you don't like the interest rate shop around, don't accept the offer.
We can do nothing to make a change if we continue to pay the higher prices, taking stands (no matter how small) are the only way to make things change. Companies are, after all, going to make money any way they can and it doesn't matter if their CEO is male or female.
Did you know that regular products have chemicals in them that make you bleed more and are often bleached to be more white? And, as a health educator, I can tell you for CERTAIN there is NO need to put bleach that close to your crotch. I would urge/suggest using organic tampons where the cotton is free of toxins or reusable items like lunapads or the diva cup.
You can:
cut down on cost
cut down on waste
be nicer to your body
be nicer to the environment
A Win Win for all!
www.lunapads.com
They have reusable washable pads, and the Diva cup. Diva cup is a soft cup made out of silicone which is boil-able and sanitize-able which is better than the keeper a similar product made of rubber.
http://www.natracare.com/health_and_environment/your_health_and_environment2.htm
This site has the most comprehensive list of terms and materials. you can also find Natra Care stuff at Whole Foods.
http://www.maximhy.com/slideshow/




